Issue - meetings

Corporate Governance

Meeting: 26/10/2011 - Corporate Governance Committee (Item 4)

4 Corporate Governance pdf icon PDF 88 KB

Minutes:

A report by the Chief Executive set out the reasons for establishing the Committee i.e. to drive forward changes in the way the Council operates, its Terms of Reference and a proposed agenda for its inaugural meeting.

 

Members were aware that AKA had been engaged by the former Leader of the Council.  Their remit had been to undertake an independent review of the Council’s response to claims made by Mr Martin Morton.  AKA had produced a Supplemental Report entitled ‘Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council’s Corporate Governance Arrangements: Refresh and Renew’ (The Corporate Governance Report) which summarised organisational weaknesses which the Council had failed to address.

 

The Cabinet had considered this report at its meeting on 22 September 2011 and resolved to accept the criticisms unreservedly and the recommendations designed to help the Council move forward.  It had also resolved to establish this, time limited, Cabinet Committee tasked with driving forward the changes which needed to be made in the way the Council was managed and in respect of its organisational culture. It was anticipated that the work of this Committee would be concluded by 31 March 2012.  The Cabinet had also noted that the Leader of the Council was keen for all three parties to work together to help resolve the issues that had been raised.

 

Members noted that the Corporate Governance Report had proposed a number of work streams to address the issues:

 

(1)  A Councillor Working Group supported by Officers

(2)  Taking the Lead Delivery Team

(3)  Review and Improve Corporate Governance Development and

Training across the Council

(4)  System Stress Tests across the Council

(5)  Corporate Governance Amnesty

 

The Cabinet had also asked this Committee to:

 

(a)  consider an initial report (from the Deputy Chief Executive/Director of Finance) on ways to strengthen the Council’s Internal Audit Team.

(b)  consider an initial report (from the Director of Law, HR and Asset Management) on ways to strengthen Legal and Member Services.

 

The Cabinet had additionally referred proposals in respect of Performance Management to this Committee as follows:

 

“In the light of the recent receipt of the independent report on Corporate Governance, Cabinet believes this report [Performance Management] should first be referred to the newly set up Cabinet Committee [The Corporate Governance Committee] in order to ensure that it meets all the necessary requirements to help the Council tackle the major problems ahead. 

 

Members were also informed that at its meeting on 29 September 2011, the Employment and Appointments Committee had agreed that this Committee should consider the creation of a dedicated Policy Unit working directly to the Chief Executive, and the creation of a new post of Head of Policy Unit.

 

Members noted that failure to respond appropriately to this report would mean that the Council and its residents remained at risk of:

 

  (a)  service failure

  (b)  external inspection under the Local Government Act 1999

  (c)  failure to respond appropriately to the self improvement regime anticipated from April 2012

 

Members noted, in particular, that there were ten areas of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4