The Lead Commissioner for Strategic Transport and Technology introduced the report of the Director of Regeneration and Place which considered the objections and expressions of support received regarding the proposed active travel scheme on Birkenhead Road in the Seacombe ward. The report noted that the purpose of the Birkenhead Road scheme was to create an environment that was safe for both pedestrians and cyclists and to help embed walking and cycling as part of new long-term commuting habits.

Members queried whether the funding for this scheme was necessary and if the option to “do nothing” was considered. They were informed that if the scheme was rejected then the funding would be returned to the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority.

Members asked what was going to happen to the trees that would be removed under this scheme and if the trees closest to Seacombe Ferry were due to be removed as there were 11 mature trees on the site presently. It was explained that officers were working with the Council’s Tree Team to see where new trees could be located inline with the Council’s tree strategy. Officer offered to come back to Members with information on the specific trees that would be moved. The Design and Commissioning Senior Manager confirmed that the trees near the rear car park of Seacombe Ferry would remain under this proposal.

Members queried if there were any figures that would indicate what economic effect increased cycling or walking might have on an area. The Lead Commissioner for Strategic Transport and Technology noted that there were a number of national studies that showed that people walking or cycling were likely to spend more money in an area as they are likely to visit more often.

Members questioned if the consultation process included a contact method other than on-line. They were assured that 360 letters had been sent out to local businesses and letters with details of the consultation and included information on how to contact the Council if they did not wish to use an electronic form of contact.

Councillor J Robinson indicated that she had alternative recommendations to those on the report. The suggested recommendations were shared with Members.

On a motion proposed by Councillor J Robinson and seconded by Councillor P Martin, it was -

Resolved (10:1) – That

In light of the risks identified in Paragraph 7.2 of the report and the concerns raised in terms of the consultation and design, accessibility and impacts on other environmental factors to create the Birkenhead Scheme (removing mature trees), the Director of Regeneration and Place be requested to:

1.  Seek an extension of time for delivery on this scheme; and

2. Consider other design options, taking into consideration the concerns raised with a view to enable a meaningful consultation to take place (to include residents and local businesses