Resolved – That Councillor H Smith be appointed Chair for this meeting.

Members of the Sub-Committee were asked to declare any disclosable pecuniary and non pecuniary interests in connection with any application on the agenda and state the nature of the interest.

Councillor H Smith declared a non pecuniary personal interest by virtue of being a member of CAMRA.

The Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment reported upon an application that had been received from Leonard Henry for a Premises Licence in respect of 56 Mill Lane, Liscard, under the provisions of the Licensing Act 2003.

The hours requested were outlined within the report.  The applicant had submitted an operating schedule setting out how the business would be conducted/managed in accordance with the four licensing objectives.  A copy of the full application was available.  Members were advised that the proposals set out in the operating schedule may become conditions of the licence should the licence be granted.

A representation had been received from a local resident who objected to the application being granted.  A petition had also been received containing 200 signatures.  The representation related to concerns that should the application be granted, anti-social behaviour caused by youths would increase within the vicinity of the premises.

A representation had been received from a Licence Holder of a similar type of premises based in Derby who was in support of the application.  He considered that the Licensing Objectives would not be undermined should the application be granted.

Copies of the representations and petition were available.

The applicant, Mr Henry attended the meeting together with Mr Scott, who had made the representation in support of the application.

The Licensing Manager confirmed that all documentation had been sent and received.

Mr Henry addressed the Sub-Committee and outlined the application.  He advised Members that the premises would operate following the principles of the micro pub ethos which was a relatively new concept.  He advised that the micro pub was usually set up in an old shop, was small and focussed on the local community.  It promoted the sale of cask ales for the more mature drinker and was a place to socialise.  He informed Members that the premises would not have any lager, alcopops, cocktails, music, duke box or fruit machines but that a selection of cask ales would be provided together with fine wines, soft drinks and snacks.  He also advised that no beers with an ABV above 6.5% would be sold at the premises and that drinking would not be permitted outside the premises.  He informed Members that his aim was to provide a pub with a relaxed atmosphere that would attract people from the local community and real ale drinkers where they could sit and chat and read the newspapers.  Mr Henry reported that Mr Scott had been operating a similar premises in Derby for 18 months and had received no complaints.  He believed that the model on which the premises was based would meet the four licensing objectives.

Mr Henry responded to questions from Members of the Sub-Committee and Mr D K Abraham, Legal Advisor to the Sub-Committee.

In response to questions, Mr Henry informed the Sub-Committee that he would be content for a condition to be attached to the Premises Licence in relation to no drinks being allowed to be taken outside by people wishing to  ...  view the full minutes text for item 9.