Decision details

Outcome of Lyndale School Consultation

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Decisions:

Prior to consideration of the item the Cabinet considered a video which had been submitted by Ms D. Hughes.

 

The Leader of the Council, having welcomed everyone to the meeting, invited Ms Zoe Anderson, Parent Governor and parent of a child at The Lyndale School to address the Cabinet. Ms Anderson, spoke on behalf of the staff and parents of the school and spoke of the particular needs of the children at The Lyndale and gave a personal account of her own child’s needs and experiences which she felt could only be provided for at The Lyndale School.

 

Speaking on behalf of parents Ms Anderson made representations in strong support of retaining The Lyndale School, the consultation responses, the expert report and the proposed options.

 

Ms Anderson specifically stated that the staff at The Lyndale had gained the trust of all the parents to look after their child’s medical, physical and educational needs – which was the fundamental concern. Ms Anderson highlighted the excellent support, care and education provided all the children at The Lyndale School. The school had excellent facilities including very good outside space to which the children had full access. Ms Anderson commented that The Lyndale School provided the children with a wonderful sensory environment that was safe and relaxed. She asked that a full review be undertaken of the care given to each individual child by staff at The Lyndale School.

 

Ms Anderson commented that the school’s staff provided specialised care, support and education; they were adept at communicating effectively with the children – skills which took many years to perfect. She stated that it took time to build up trust, and it was unfair that staff did not know what was to happen from week to week. The school played an integral part in the community, and interacted and participated with other neighbouring schools. Ms Anderson shared/circulated a Parents Survey that had been undertaken that showed parents wanted their children to remain at The Lyndale School. 

 

Within her representations, Ms Anderson asked that the funding bands be revisited to reflect the needs of each individual child that attended the school. She highlighted that the school had previously asked for the Schools Forum to revisit the schools banding due to the change in circumstances.

 

In relation to the consultation document, Ms Anderson reiterated that The Lyndale School was not looking for the Council to enhance the funding but to maintain the funding that was already in place. Ms Anderson stated that parents had confidence in the school but not the process that the parents were involved in. She reminded Cabinet Members that the Council had a legal obligation to listen to the parents under the SEN Test. Ms Anderson drew an analogy with medical consultants who always ask parents for their views and thoughts.

 

Ms Anderson stated that consultation responses clearly showed overwhelming support for The Lyndale School to be retained. Comments were also made in relation to the consultant (Ms L Wright) and her report.

 

Concerns were expressed that the ethos of The Lyndale School would not be replicated at either the Stanley or Elleray Park Schools, not least because the children attending these schools had different needs. Ms Anderson stated that the suitability of expanding these two schools was based upon assumptions, which was not evidence; and that simply providing training to staff was no substitute for experience. Concerns were raised over health and safety issues and the need for both schools to be upgraded at considerable cost.

 

Ms Anderson concluded by stating that experienced and effective staff would leave due to the uncertainty and proposals. There would be no investment in The Lyndale School and it would instead stagnate; and parents would not want or be willing to subject their children to such an outcome.

 

The Leader of the Council thanked Ms Hughes for her informative video and Ms Anderson for her representations. He acknowledged and confirmed that he appreciated the time and effort expended by everyone in supporting the school and pupils. He indicated that Members of the Cabinet had read all reports, representations and the feedback received in relation to The Lyndale School and had also met with parents and staff. He sincerely thanked all staff and parents.

 

Introduced by the Director of Children’s Services, the Cabinet considered the report from the Director of Children’s Services which detailed the outcome of the consultation on the closure of The Lyndale School. 

 

The report outlined the responses received during the consultation, reviewed alternative options identified, as well as detailing the outcome of the SEN Improvement Test.

 

The report indicated that, on 16 January 2014 (Minute 129 refers) Cabinet agreed to undertake a consultation on the closure of The Lyndale School.  The consultation closed in June 2014.  The report recommended that Cabinet considered the contents of the report and made a decision on this matter. 

 

The Director of Children’s Services commended the care, quality and passion of the staff at The Lyndale School which was endorsed by Ofsted and noted their excellent quality of care towards all pupils who attended the school and indicated that she along with her Department would be working closely with all staff and parents to end the uncertainty surrounding the future of The Lyndale School and bring this to a conclusion as soon as possible for both children, parents, and staff.

 

In relation to consultation, the Director of Children’s Services indicated that she had met with parents,’ school staff, school governors and an MP; Councillors had also undertaken site visits to the schools and various public meetings had been held to encourage consultation and feedback. 

 

In relation to concerns raised by parents regarding health and safety at Elleray Park and Stanley School these were sent to both Headteachers of the schools who responded to the Council who then responded to the parents questions.

 

In relation to staff, the Director of Children’s Services indicated that she had spoken to all staff at The Lyndale School when she visited as and reiterated that those affected would be fully supported throughout the transition as far as the Council can do.

 

In response to comments from parents, the Director of Children’s Services indicated that there had been no evidence to suggest that parents had been steered away from The Lyndale School by Children’s Services officers although accepted that due to the uncertainty that surrounded The Lyndale School this could be a contributing factor.

 

In relation to the option in which it was proposed that The Lyndale School close and a new PMLD base be opened on the new Foxfield site, the Director of Children’s Services indicated that she had recently spoken with the Headteacher of Foxfield School who had spoken with his Chair of Governors and the Headteacher indicated that it would be inappropriate to have a primary setting even in a separate unit, therefore this option could not be considered.

 

The Chair welcomed Ms Lynn Wright, Independent Consultant, who had been appointed to consult on the proposal to close The Lyndale School, the options, including those which had emerged throughout the consultation period, and give her view on the SEN Improvement Test.

 

Ms Wright gave feedback on her findings in relation to each of the options considered; the full report was attached as an appendix.

 

In response to the Council’s intention to increase the closure period from 2015 to 2016, Ms Wright advised against this as this would have huge implications for the pupils and staff that already had gone through a long period of uncertainty. Ms Wright indicated that the funding system had changed nationally and that schools that were no longer viable or sustainable should not be allowed to continue.

 

The Leader of the Council thanked Ms Wright for her detailed report and feedback on the considered options.

 

The Cabinet Member for Children and Family Services thanked all staff and parents for their comments and feedback and indicated that the Cabinet had considered all options in a transparent manner and had listened carefully to what had been said. Cabinet Members were reminded to have regard to the Council Referral under the previous Agenda Item in considering this matter. The Cabinet Member reiterated the need for stability at The Lyndale School and that this had been looked at for both financial and educational reasons, which had to be taken into consideration due to the funding formula changes introduced by Central Government.

 

Councillor T Smith moved the following motion duly seconded by G. Davies:

 

(1)  Cabinet thanks all those who have participated in the consultation exercise, with particular regard to submissions from parents of children at The Lyndale School;

 

(2)  Having reviewed the responses received during the consultation process, analysed the alternative options and applied the SEN Improvement Test, it is recommended that:

 

·  Statutory notices be published in respect of the closure of The Lyndale School from January 2016.

·  That Wirral Council, under the leadership of the Director of Children’s Services, work individually, with children and families, towards effecting a smooth and supportive transition to an alternative place at one of the following schools:

 

§  Elleray Park Special School

§  Stanley Special School

§  Another appropriate school

·   

·  In doing so, that the Director of Children’s Services, in acknowledgement of the close relationships that exist between staff and pupils at The Lyndale School, investigates if staff could be employed, where possible, at receiving schools, (subject to legal practice and the approval of governing bodies).

·  The Director of Children’s Services be authorised to take all necessary steps to publish the proposals and ensure the prescribed procedures are followed, including requesting permissions from the Secretary of State, in furtherance of the proposals.

·  A further report be brought on the outcome of the publication of the statutory notices.

 

and outlined the following reasons for the motion.

 

Having looked at all the options, and applied the SEN Improvement Test, it is our opinion that, while we recognise the special place that The Lyndale School has in the affection of parents and children, the continued operation and maintenance of a school of this size will not meet the future educational needs of the children, nor is a financially viable option, especially when there are good alternative options available.

 

The Council has a responsibility to ensure for the sustainable future provision of education for the pupils of The Lyndale School. In addition, we have to manage resources effectively for all schools and the school population.

 

This was a difficult decision to make, and we would like to affirm our continued intention to work positively with the families and the children affected, and reassure parents of our continued commitment to their child’s wellbeing and education. 

 

Councillor P. Davies moved an amendment, duly seconded by Councillor Mooney, that an additional point be included in the motion, namely:

 

·  The Director of Children’s Services to ensure that Education, Health and Care Plans for all pupils of The Lyndale School are completed by 31st October 2014.

 

which was carried unanimously.

 

IT WAS RESOLVED: That

 

(1)  Cabinet thanks all those who have participated in the consultation exercise, with particular regard to submissions from parents of children at The Lyndale School;

 

(2)  Having reviewed the responses received during the consultation process, analysed the alternative options and applied the SEN Improvement Test, it is recommended that:

 

·  Statutory notices be published in respect of the closure of The Lyndale School from January 2016.

·  That Wirral Council, under the leadership of the Director of Children’s Services, work individually, with children and families, towards effecting a smooth and supportive transition to an alternative place at one of the following schools:

 

§  Elleray Park Special School

§  Stanley Special School

§  Another appropriate school

·   

·  In doing so, that the Director of Children’s Services, in acknowledgement of the close relationships that exist between staff and pupils at The Lyndale School, investigates if staff could be employed, where possible, at receiving schools, (subject to legal practice and the approval of governing bodies).

·  The Director of Children’s Services be authorised to take all necessary steps to publish the proposals and ensure the prescribed procedures are followed, including requesting permissions from the Secretary of State, in furtherance of the proposals.

·  A further report be brought on the outcome of the publication of the statutory notices.

·  The Director of Children’s Services to ensure that Education, Health and Care Plans for all pupils of The Lyndale School are completed by 31st October 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

Publication date: 10/09/2014

Date of decision: 04/09/2014

Decided at meeting: 04/09/2014 - Cabinet

Effective from: 18/09/2014

This decision has been called in by:

  • Councillor Paul Hayes who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Jeff Green who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Phil Gilchrist who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Leah Fraser who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior to the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority were not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, were flawed, insofar as the Chair was a council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test."
  • Councillor Mrs Pat Williams who writes who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior to the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior to the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. ""
  • Councillor Steve Williams who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test "
  • Councillor Chris Blakeley who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test."
  • Councillor Eddie Boult who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test."
  • Councillor Gerry Ellis who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test."
  • Councillor John Hale who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test."
  • Councillor Andrew Hodson who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test."
  • Councillor Kathy Hodson who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test."
  • Councillor Bruce Berry who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Chris Carubia who writes The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. Cabinet had, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend theLyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. "
  • Councillor Wendy Clements who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Stuart Kelly who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent's of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant's report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet's decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor's and parent's ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as 'generous' by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather 'high level notes' which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test."
  • Councillor Dave Mitchell who writes the same as thoes stated by Cllr paul hayes"
  • Councillor Geoffrey Watt who writes  1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior to the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor David M Elderton who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Tom Anderson who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Mike Hornby who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Cherry Povall, JP who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Lesley Rennie who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Les Rowlands who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Tracey Pilgrim who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Adam Sykes who writes 1. The Independent Consultant appointed to comment upon the options for Lyndale School was appointed unilaterally by the Local Authority, with no consultation with the Governors or Parent’s of Lyndale School. 2. The Independent Consultant’s report was not commissioned prior the consultation and was published once the consultation had closed, therefore not allowing any proper or adequate scrutiny of the aforementioned report. 3. Cabinet had prepared, prior to the meeting, a typed and printed recommendation which was moved by Cllr Tony Smith and agreed unanimously by attending members of the Cabinet. It would therefore seem that Cabinet’s decision had insufficient regard to the presentations made at the Cabinet meeting, including the articulate and highly persuasive contributions from parent representative Zoe Anderson. 4. Education, Health and Care Plans are currently being drafted in respect of all pupils who attend the Lyndale School. In order for Cabinet, the Independent Consultant, or indeed the wider public, to have sufficient information to decide whether or not these pupils could continue their education at alternative schools the aforementioned plans should have been published prior top the opening of the consultation. 5. A series of questions raised by Governors and Parents of the Lyndale School to the Local Authority where not answered adequately or at all, so as to hinder the Governor’s and parent’s ability to fully respond to the consultation process. 6. The consultation meetings, although described as ‘generous’ by the Independent Consultant, where flawed, insofar as the Chair was an council officer and could not reasonably have been seen as independent given officers previous recommendations to Cabinet. Additionally no minutes of these meetings where published but rather ’high level notes’ which where not conducive to the principle of a full and open consultation. 7. Owing to the above the Cabinet could not have made a properly informed decision as to whether the proposals met the SEN Improvement Test. "
  • Councillor Pat Cleary who writes for the same reasons as given by Cllr Paul Hayes."
  • Councillor Alan Brighouse who writes For the 7 reasons listed by Councillor Paul Hayes."

Accompanying Documents: